Novel Partners Post # 3

NAME: Fiona Jackson        DATE: February 16, 2011 TITLE: The Lovely Bones TIME: 3 hours AUTHOR: Alice Sebold      PAGES: 161 - 280 TOTAL PAGES THIS WEEK: 119

What I read today made me feel extremely happy. Or at least some of what I read. What made me so happy was when Samuel proposed to Lindsey. I think that it is incredible that their relationship withstood every thing that this family has been through. But know that I think about it, it may have even made them a stronger couple. Nothing could ever happen to them that could be worse than something that they have already been forced to face and deal with. Susie's death may have even brought them together the first time back when they were 13. He approached her after it happened. That showed her that he honestly truly cared about her.  I am so glad that Lindsey had someone to go to when no one else was there. Samuel is her soul mate and he came to her when she most needed him. That is why when he proposed to her it filled me with joy. But on a different subject, what I read today also made me extremely sad. The book was talking about Buckley a lot and about how Susie's death and his mother leaving has affected him. He sounds like it has messed him up a lot. I was basically in tears when he was talking about how he has taught himself to make his heart go from heart to stone so that he can't get hurt anymore. That was when he was 4 years old. That is too early for a child to have to think like that. It broke my heart.  Another person who is really important to the story other than the main character is Susie's mother Abigail.  Throughout the story a big part of the plot has been her struggle to cope with Susie's death. She makes some interesting decisions, like cheating on her husband, but the worst thing is that she get's up and leaves. It wasn't very clear if she explained why she felt she needed to do this to her husband and children or not, but one day she decided to drive to California. I don't really understand this. Why does losing your other two children make losing your first one better? I don't get why she thought that that would help. How could she do that to her family? Those kids had enough to deal with. They didn't need to lose their mother too. That is just horrible. And you can tell that it has screwed Buckley up a lot. He lost his mother when he was 4 years old. And he doesn't even really have the comfort of having her die. She chose to leave him. She had a choice. And she didn't choose him and Lindsey. That's the worst part. But I have a feeling that she may come back.  A couple things in this book upset me clearly. But the worst thing is that Mr. Harvey hasn't been caught. He killed so many people and no one knows it's him. It makes me so mad. He deserves to be caught. He needs to be caught. Well, at least they have figured out that Susie's dad was right all along and that it was Mr. Harvey. But then he just disappears. It's incredibly frustrating. I really hope that he get's caught. He has brutally murdered like 10 people. One girl was 5 years old! It makes me sick! I can not understand how he lives with himself. He went to Susie's funeral. I would not be able to deal with that.  It's so wrong. He must have something seriously wrong with him. I'm sure he does. He must have some sort of a mental disorder. I mean come on, he kills the neighborhood animals to keep himself from killing the neighborhood kids. He needs help. I wish that he could get some.

Novel Partners Post # 2

NAME: Fiona Jackson DATE: February 10th, 2011 

TITLE: The Lovely Bones  TIME: 2 hours

AUTHOR: Alice Sebold  PAGES: 80-157

TOTAL PAGES THIS WEEK: 77

How did what you read today make you feel? Why? 


As you might have heard, this book is a very sad and horrific one. Some people may not enjoy books or stories like this one because of that. Some people may not want to spend time thinking about the possibilities of things like a little girl being murdered are. But so far this book has taught me a lot. It's not like I enjoy sitting there and reading about horrible things, but to me books like this are a lot more meaningful, and have a better message then a silly book trying to hard to be funny. For example, this book has taught me a lot about death and about what it does to people. No one I have ever been close to has died yet. Seeing how the family deals with Susie's death has taught me a lot. I expected that because Susie died, the family would grow closer. That they would lean on each other. But the opposite happened. Abigail,  (Susie's mother) had an affair with the police officer Len Fenerman. She chose to lean and depend on him instead of her husband who was actually right about George. Lindsey went to Samuel her boyfriend. Buckley has started to talk to himself, pretending he's seeing and talking to Susie. Her father Jack focused a lot on Buckley, but when that started to deteriorate he focused on trying to prove that George was guilty. But the police gave up on him. Instead of watching this family bloom and grow together, I have watched them wilt and die. 


What do you think about a particular character's actions? Was he/she right or wrong to do that? 
When I realized that Abigail was falling for Len, it upset me a great deal. I had faith that the family would not fall apart. And I understand why that she did it. She needed a way to get away and forget Susie. But why couldn't she do it in a different way. I think that cheating on your husband would never be the right way to go in a situation like that. How would Jack feel? He didn't do anything crazy like that! All he was concerned about was getting evidence about George killing Susie. I think that that actually may be the reason that she went to Len for comfort. He is a police man. His job was to catch Susie's killer. No matter what Jack says, Len would always be right and know best because he is a Police man. Even though Jack was right, and Len was wrong. I also feel ashamed of Len. I can't believe that he would do that to their family given the situation. And he knows exactly what their situation is. Everyone does. He is the one trying to help their family and all he does is make it worse. Much worse. And obviously other people are going to find out. Lindsey will, or Jack will. Lindsey's grandma could just tell from seeing Abigail. She confronted Abigail about it, and Abigail completely ignored it. I think that Abigail's actions were wrong, but I don't really blame her actually. She had to do something. But she wasn't strong enough, so she chose a  very bad outlet. I feel sorry for her. I feel sorry for Susie. I feel sorry for their whole family. 


What was one of your favorite lines (or sentences) in what you read today? Copy it down and tell why you liked it.


"It's one of my secret pleasures," she admitted. "After all these years I still love to watch the souls that float and spin in masses, all of them clamoring at once inside the air." "I don't see anything," I said the first time. " Watch closely," she sad, "and hush." But I felt them before I saw them, small warm sparks along my arms. Then there they were, fireflies lighting up and expanding in howls and and swirls as they abandoned human flesh. "Like snowflakes." Franny said, "none of them the same and yet each one, from where we stand , exactly like the one before."

I really liked this quote because it kind of confused me but intrigued me at the same time. It is a interesting way of describing souls, like snowflakes. But I liked it, because it seems like it would be correct, especially if you were in heaven watching all these new people come. They are all different and unique people, but all the same. They all made the same mistakes, they all feel the same way. I also thought that this quote was kind of meaningful because it made me wonder if Franny had been watching when Susie's soul was leaving Earth. And then there they are now watching even more people come. It also made me kind of sad because it talked about how many souls they could see, and that obviously represents how many people are dying, and that made me start wondering how many other people's death was like Susie's, so horrific and wrong. This quote was interesting to me, so I included it. 

The Lovely Bones Post #1

NAME: Fiona Jackson                  DATE: February 3, 2011

TITLE: The Lovely Bones            TIME: 2 hours

AUTHOR: Alice Sebold                 PAGES: 1-80 

TOTAL PAGES THIS WEEK: 80

Would you read another book by this Author? Why or why not? 

I would definitely read another book by this Author. So far in the book the Author has a very interesting and creative writing style. I find it really interesting to be reading part of the book through the perspective of the girl in heaven. I like the way the author describes heaven and think that the way she writes the story is really cool. I would read another book by her because this book is written so well. I like the idea, and how she keeps dropping hints about what the rest of the book is going to be about that leave you wondering and wanting to read more. I would read another book by her hoping that it would be as unique and intriguing as this one. 

What does this book make you wonder about? Why? 

This book makes me wonder a lot about heaven, and what happens after you die. The reason for this is that the girl who dies, (Susie) goes to heaven and talks about what it is like for her. In the book it is described as being a good place, or somewhere were you get everything that you want or desire except to be alive again of course. So basically, if you just think about wanting a hamburger, then you would get one. But you have to realize this gift in order to really be able to use it to your advantage. Also, in your heaven, you are not alone. You are with other dead people. And you can share your house with a friend or be alone. Again, it's whatever you desire. Also you get to watch the people on earth. So Susie gets to look down and see how her parents are coping with her death. In my opinion, I don't think that that would be a very fun thing to have to do. It also seems like it would be incredibly frustrating to know exactly were your body is and who killed you and not be able to tell your parents or the police. So this book really makes me wonder what happens after your dead. Is it something like what it is described to be in the book? Is it nothing like it? Is there no such thing as heaven? There is an endless amount of possibilities. 

Explain how the Author creates suspense in the book. 

The author creates suspense in an interesting way in this book. She is starting to drop hints that Susie is going to find a way to communicate with her family. For example, Susie accidentally made her face appear in a collection of broken glass which leads her father to believe that Susie is trying to talk to him. She makes it sort of clear that it's going to be a reoccurring theme in the book, but doesn't explain why or how. 

Book Review

Fiona Jackson

January 7th, 2011

Lord Of the Flies   

Written by William Golding

Lord of the Flies is a book about a group of Bristish boys who get stranded on a desert island. At first it’s all fun and games without adults or rules, but then chaos begins to set in. Kids start to disagree about major decisions, people start to become frightened and rumors begin to soar across the island. Basically, it is a story meant to show human nature. What we resort to when we are scared and in danger. But to me it seemed like there were a lot of other hidden meanings also. The main characters, (Ralph, Jack, Piggy, Simon...etc.) go through a crazy journey in which they learn a lot about each other and themselves. It’s a little old fashioned and some of the wording is a little hard to understand at first, but I think that it’s worth it to put a little thought into it.

I mostly enjoyed this book. Like I mentioned before, you have to put some thought into the book. And it gets a little bit gruesome at parts. But I thought it was a pretty good book. I definitely think that it’s worth reading. It can teach you a lot. It shows different types of leaders, how people act under pressure, when and why people respect each other, and how children's imagination’s can run wild. For example, two of the characters, Ralph and Jack, (protagonist and antagonist) are both ruled out to be leaders on the island. And they are good people to be in charge, they are natural leaders. But in very different ways. They had very different ideas and were very stubborn about them. The book taught me about respect because one of the main characters, (Piggy) was disrespected solely because he was fat and wore glasses. So, in this books world, you have to be pretty to matter. And the ironic part about that is that Piggy was the only one who was smart enough to figure things out.

Lord of the Flies was one of those books that made you never want to put it down. You would always want to know what comes next. It was interesting, horrifying, and aggravating all at once. But in a good way. That made it more fun to read, because it always left you guessing. It made you wonder if they would get rescued, if they would all survive, or if Ralph would prove to be a good leader or not.

Sometimes when I was reading this book it got so weird and wacky that I decided that I didn’t like it. But once I had read the whole book, I realized that it was worth it to get through those parts. I think that this book is a lot of things, but of those things is a good read. It is worth your time. You come to love some of the characters and hate others. You learn a lot from this book and it makes you wonder about a lot.

Overall, I liked this book and recommend it to anyone who is wondering about reading it. It taught me a lot and helped me understand human nature better. I took a lot of time thinking and analyzing this book and it was really interesting. The writing style is great, William Golding makes you feel as if you are really there on the island with them. The characters are defined well, you get a clear picture of them in your head. I hope that if you decide to read it, that you enjoy it as much as I did.

Weekly Reading Response # 3

NAME Fiona Jackson  DATE October 20th, 2010 TITLE The Curios Case Of the Dog in the Night-Time. TIME: 2 HOURS AUTHOR: Mark Haddon PAGES 106-226 TOTAL PAGES THIS WEEK 120 Pages This book was very unique in a lot of ways. The book is written about something that happens to a boy and it is written from that boys perspective. What makes the book interesting isn't only the storyline though. It is also the fact that the boy is Autistic, or has something different about his brain that makes him think in ways that are very different than the way most people think. He can't understand human emotions, and relates better to animals than humans. He is a extremely logical person, and is amazing at math. He pretty much looks at everything in life as one big math problem. I think that I found the book interesting for those reasons. The story would have been pretty boring if it wasn't for the fact that you get to see it through the eyes of someone who thinks in a whole different way then you. It was like stepping into a whole new world, where things that seem totally normal in our world, upset you so much and causes so much pain you just have to sit down and groan. I also liked the book because the boy, (Christopher) overcomes some of his fears. He figures out ways on his own to help him overcome the fear that ruled his life. I liked that. But I didn't like the way the story ended. Christopher didn't really seem like he was happier in the position he was in at the end of the story than the one he was in in the beginning of the story. Which was okay, because he was pretty happy in the beginning of the story. But the story just kind of cut off. I was really surprised to find that it was over. I even flipped through the last blank pages to make sure I wasn't missing anything. It was strange. I mean, the book's last paragraph did have an ending sense, but it could have just been the end of the chapter the way it was written.  Something that I really liked about a character was the way the Mother acted throughout this book. It might seem strange that I say this because the mother basically abandoned her son to go live with the man she had an affair with. But she was confused during that time. She had a bad moment. Then when Christopher didn't answer any of her letters, she began to worry and just assume that Christopher was angry with her. Then, when Christopher showed up at her house, and told her that his father had told him that she was dead, she moved out of the man she was living with's house and moved back to Swindon to be with Christopher which was probably very hard for her to do since she did love the man she was living with. I thought that it must have been a very hard decision to make. But I also felt very bad for the Father because Christopher was scared of him and thought that he was going to try and kill him, so he wouldn't go near him or talk to him. If Christopher saw him at all he would scream his head of. That would be so hard. Having your own son be so scared of you that he wouldn't talk to you or refuse to be in the same house as you. Anyway, overall I though that this was a really good book and would recommend it to other people.

Weekly Reading Response # 2

NAME: Fiona Jackson DATE: October 19th, 2010

TITLE: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night -Time TIME: 2 HOURS

AUTHOR: Mark Haddon  PAGES: 1-106

TOTAL PAGES THIS WEEK: 106 Pages 

Something I have found really interesting about this book is that the main character, Christopher, is autistic. I am not positive about this but I am pretty sure. It is interesting because it is like he is writing the book, so it shows exactly how he thinks about everything. The way things make him feel. It is interesting because he is a really mathematical person so he thinks about everything really detailed. He has a photographic memory and he kind of explained what it is like to have a memory like that which is cool because it is so different than the way my memory is. This boy is so smart, but he is difficulty to talk to because his brain works a different way then everyone else's. I can't tell whether his parents understand what exactly is different about him. They clearly know something is different about him though because there are some things that he can't tolerate. for example, he won't eat anything that is yellow or brown, his food can't be touching, he has a game about the colors of cars which determine what kind of day he is going to have, he doesn't like to be touched, and would much rather be alone then with people. 

This book reminds me of a movie I watched once called Temple Grandin. That movie was about a girl who had autism and was also super smart and didn't like to be touched. This is the main reason that I think that Christopher is also autistic. The two characters had lot's of similarities, and it is interesting to compare the way the different writers/directors showed the way the autistic people think. In the movie they kind of showed a picture for everything she was thinking. In the book the author does a similar thing but uses words to describe it instead of a picture. I really think that it is interesting how people like this's brain works. They are just on a whole different level than everyone else. For example, in the movie, there was a scene where Temple was in class, and they were supposed to be reading out of a French textbook. It appeared that Temple wasn't reading the page, so the teacher got up and went over to her and asked why she wasn't reading. She replied that she already read it, even though the teacher had just told them to read it. The teacher took away the book and asked what it said. She recited the whole page like she was reading it from her memory. In the book, there is a point where Christopher describes his memory as a being a film. When people ask him to remember things he can simply press rewind, fast forward, or pause. It's the same concept. 


At one point in the book, Christopher's father told him to never do a list of things. 
1. Not to mention Mr. Shears name in their house. 
2. Not to go asking Mrs. Shears about who killed the bloody dog.
3. Not to go asking anyone about who killed that bloody dog.
4. Not to go trespassing in other peoples gardens. 
5. To stop this ridiculous bloody detective game. 
Christopher clearly understands this, but will not give up on his detective game. He just decides to do it in ways that his father did not clearly say. Which shows that he is very clever, but that his mind kind of works like a young child's. Kind of manipulative. But that he just doesn't understand when he upsets people. It must be really hard not to get frustrated with him really easily. I don't think that I would be able to keep as calm with someone like that as his father does. And I think that that is a big part of why his mother ran off. Because she really did feel like she couldn't take it anymore and that it would be better for everyone else if she just left. I can understand how she might of felt. But I am not saying that what she did was right. 

Independent Reading Book

My new Independent Reading Book is called The Curios Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon.